code logs -> 2016 -> Tue, 12 Apr 2016< code.20160411.log - code.20160413.log >
--- Log opened Tue Apr 12 00:00:55 2016
00:01 catadroid [catalyst@Nightstar-3965e6.dab.02.net] has joined #code
00:03 catadroid` [catalyst@Nightstar-6crik0.dab.02.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 121 seconds]
00:05
<@Reiv>
8 dice @ 5+, rerolling all misses once is mathematically equivalent to 12 dice @ 5+ but with a much tighter distribution, correct?
00:06
<@Reiv>
My intuition declares it self-evidence (after all, if you roll 8 fails, you get 8 more rolls; whilst with 12-flat you roll only 4; simultaneously you cap at 8 instead of 12 at the upper end)
00:06
<@Reiv>
But I want to make sure I'm not insane.
00:07
<@Reiv>
The second wrinkle is what happens if this suddenly becomes 8 @ 4+ vs 12 @ 4+; I /think/ that it still averages to 6 hits overall, but I get the feeling this is more by happy fluke of dice than anything.
00:07
<&Derakon>
Mm, my intuition is that you take a flat distribution, and then shift 33% of the 1-4 results into 5-6.
00:08
<@Reiv>
It's hardly flat; it's binomial but a pretty stretched one
00:08 Turaiel[Offline] is now known as Turaiel
00:08
<&Derakon>
Oh wait, you're counting number of "hits", sorry.
00:08
<&Derakon>
Yeah, it's been too long since I did this stuff for me to be anything more than a distraction.
00:12
<~Vornicus>
1/3 + 2/3 * 1/3 = 5/9; thus this is somewhere around 8 dice @ 3.66666+
00:12
<~Vornicus>
Each die can be considered independent.
00:27
<@Reiv>
But
00:27
<@Reiv>
I, uh, hrm
00:28
<@Reiv>
I have for a very long time assumed that rerolling a 5+ die works out roughly to rolling a 4+ die to start with
00:28
<@Reiv>
Is this assumption incorrect?
00:35 Turaiel is now known as Turaiel[Offline]
00:35 Turaiel[Offline] is now known as Turaiel
00:36 catadroid [catalyst@Nightstar-3965e6.dab.02.net] has quit [[NS] Quit: Bye]
00:40 Turaiel is now known as Turaiel[Offline]
00:46
< ErikMesoy>
Reiv: A 4+ die is 1/2. A 5+ die with reroll is, as Vorn notes, 5/9. Is this within the level of "roughly" you want?
00:48
<~Vornicus>
(to be precise: 18 rolls of 5+ gives 6 successes; 18 of 4+ gives 9; 18 of 3+ gives 12; 18 of 5+ with reroll gives 10)
00:48
< ErikMesoy>
And for the other: 8 dice @ 5+,reroll is 40/9ths on average, or 4 & 4/9ths. The closest value without reroll is 13 dice @ 5+ which is 39/9ths (4 & 3/9ths).
00:52
<@Reiv>
I, hm
00:52
<@Reiv>
5+ is 1/3
00:53
<@Reiv>
For some erason I'd always mathed the reroll of the 1/3 to equal out to 1/6, and thus be equivalent
00:54
<~Vornicus>
4+ with reroll is equivalent to 3+
00:54
<@Reiv>
... aha, I may have been in error trying to go the other direction then
00:54 himi [fow035@Nightstar-dm0.2ni.203.150.IP] has joined #code
00:54 mode/#code [+o himi] by ChanServ
00:54
< ErikMesoy>
The reroll of 1/3 is an extra 2/9.
00:55
<@Reiv>
Well, I am educated.
00:55
<@Reiv>
Mildly annoyed at my intuition, but educated nonetheless.
00:56
<@Reiv>
Ssso, 8@5+ withrerolls is actually better than 12 @ 5+ flat
00:56
<@Reiv>
How interesting.
00:56
< ErikMesoy>
Intuition is why professional gamblers can make a living. :)
00:59
<@Reiv>
Yyep, I was totally giving the house an edge of, uh, a ... that fraction is hard to work out
00:59
<~Vornicus>
10:9
01:00
< ErikMesoy>
10:9 is the ratio of EVs, at least. I doubt it's also the edge...
01:01 macdjord [macdjord@Nightstar-ahbhn1.cable.rogers.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 121 seconds]
01:02
<@Reiv>
11%
01:02
<@Reiv>
That... actually adds up pretty quick
01:05 macdjord [macdjord@Nightstar-ahbhn1.cable.rogers.com] has joined #code
01:05 mode/#code [+o macdjord] by ChanServ
01:10
< ErikMesoy>
Monte Carlo over a million rolls: if you are rolling the 12 dice @5+ and the house has 8 dice @5+reroll, program returns house 498k, reiv 325k, tie 177k.
01:11 Crossfire [Z@Nightstar-3nmkps.tpgi.com.au] has joined #code
01:11 mode/#code [+o Crossfire] by ChanServ
01:11 * Reiv snorts
01:11
<@Reiv>
Yeah >_>
01:13
< ErikMesoy>
House edge appears to be 8.5% from that.
01:15
< ErikMesoy>
Assuming I know how to calculate house edge at all, which is probably the trickiest part here. >_>
01:16
<&McMartin>
Those look like good enough raw numberes that if you *don't* someone who does could.
01:18
< ErikMesoy>
I used (house - reiv - ties/2) / total
01:22
<&McMartin>
Hm. Presumably if they push no money changes hands
01:22
<&McMartin>
Removing the ties figure gives an edge of 17%.
03:14 catalyst [catalyst@Nightstar-bt5k4h.81.in-addr.arpa] has quit [[NS] Quit: Leaving]
03:14 catadroid [catalyst@Nightstar-3965e6.dab.02.net] has joined #code
04:57 Derakon is now known as Derakon[AFK]
05:29 celticminstrel [celticminst@Nightstar-q0f7bb.dsl.bell.ca] has quit [[NS] Quit: And lo! The computer falls into a deep sleep, to awake again some other day!]
06:02 Kindamoody[zZz] is now known as Kindamoody
06:07 Reiv [NSwebIRC@Nightstar-q8avec.kinect.net.nz] has quit [Ping timeout: 121 seconds]
06:31 catadroid` [catalyst@Nightstar-2vlub4.dab.02.net] has joined #code
06:33 catadroid [catalyst@Nightstar-3965e6.dab.02.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 121 seconds]
08:10 himi [fow035@Nightstar-dm0.2ni.203.150.IP] has quit [Ping timeout: 121 seconds]
08:22 catadroid` is now known as catadroid
08:22 crystalclaw is now known as crystalclaw|AFK
08:31 catadroid [catalyst@Nightstar-2vlub4.dab.02.net] has quit [[NS] Quit: Bye]
08:45 Kindamoody is now known as Kindamoody|afk
08:52 Vornicus [Vorn@ServerAdministrator.Nightstar.Net] has quit [Connection reset by peer]
10:35 himi [fow035@Nightstar-v37cpe.internode.on.net] has joined #code
10:35 mode/#code [+o himi] by ChanServ
12:14 Emmy-zZz is now known as Emmy-Werk
12:55 Emmy [NSkiwiirc@Nightstar-41pbej.static.chello.nl] has joined #code
14:08 catadroid [catalyst@Nightstar-5k5nj9.dab.02.net] has joined #code
15:08
< Emmy>
yay for finding out newly introduced bugs you did not know about just as you demo something to your boss because you deem it 'done' >.<
15:09
<@TheWatcher>
Demos cause bugs. Well known fact~
15:09
< Emmy>
hehehehe
15:10
< Emmy>
Still, it's rather embarassing, and annoying. ^.^;
15:13
< Emmy>
Hmmh, btw, i'm curious, why so many ops in this channel?
15:15
<@TheWatcher>
The general principle can be summarised as "An armed society is a polite society"
15:15 Irssi: #code: Total of 40 nicks [22 ops, 0 halfops, 0 voices, 18 normal]
15:18
< Emmy>
Ah.
15:19
< Emmy>
However, not necessarily a peaceful society. :P
15:19
<&ToxicFrog>
This one generally is.
15:23
< Emmy>
True, True, but that probably has more to do with the fact that the average intelligence in this channel is quite a bit above normal. :d
15:25
< Emmy>
Also, Re: armed society, it does mean that those unarmed feel rather uneasy. :P
15:51 Emmy [NSkiwiirc@Nightstar-41pbej.static.chello.nl] has quit [[NS] Quit: Homeward bound!]
15:57 Red_Queen [Z@Nightstar-3nmkps.tpgi.com.au] has joined #code
15:58 mode/#code [+o Red_Queen] by ChanServ
15:59 Crossfire [Z@Nightstar-3nmkps.tpgi.com.au] has quit [Ping timeout: 121 seconds]
16:01 Vornicus [Vorn@ServerAdministrator.Nightstar.Net] has joined #code
16:01 mode/#code [+qo Vornicus Vornicus] by ChanServ
16:16 Red_Queen [Z@Nightstar-3nmkps.tpgi.com.au] has quit [Ping timeout: 121 seconds]
17:07 gizmore [kvirc@Nightstar-mupugu.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #code
17:08 celticminstrel [celticminst@Nightstar-q0f7bb.dsl.bell.ca] has joined #code
17:08 mode/#code [+o celticminstrel] by ChanServ
17:56 catalyst [catalyst@Nightstar-bt5k4h.81.in-addr.arpa] has joined #code
18:07 catadroid [catalyst@Nightstar-5k5nj9.dab.02.net] has quit [[NS] Quit: Bye]
18:10 Emmy-Werk is now known as Emmy-Noms
18:47 crystalclaw|AFK is now known as crystalclaw
19:51 Emmy-Noms is now known as Emmy
19:53 gizmore [kvirc@Nightstar-mupugu.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 121 seconds]
19:53 gizmore [kvirc@Nightstar-1to449.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #code
20:09 gizmore [kvirc@Nightstar-1to449.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [[NS] Quit: KVIrc 4.9.2 Aria http://www.kvirc.net/]
21:30
<@gnolam>
https://serverfault.com/questions/769357/recovering-from-a-rm-rf
21:31
< crystalclaw>
That one is just so sad for that person
21:31
< crystalclaw>
That's one less hosting company I suppose
22:01 Kindamoody|afk is now known as Kindamoody
22:03
< Azash>
Seems like a troll really
22:04
<&McMartin>
I am also reminded of that "you must give us everyone's passwords for auditing purposes" case
22:06
< crystalclaw>
^
22:18
< starkruzr>
stupid question: I am attempting to shake the rust off my Rails skills. I could swear to God there was a way to sort of explore my model with irb by doing things like NameOfObject.all, but it's pretending not to know what I'm talking about.
22:18
< starkruzr>
what am I forgetting to do?
22:18 macdjord [macdjord@Nightstar-ahbhn1.cable.rogers.com] has quit [[NS] Quit: Where there's a whip! (Whup-CHA!) There's a way!]
22:32
<&ToxicFrog>
McMartin: which one?
22:32
<&McMartin>
Um, will have to dig it up again
22:32
<&McMartin>
It's years old but made the rounds again recently
22:32
<&ToxicFrog>
(that is no shit the official policy at the library my MIL works at)
22:32
<&ToxicFrog>
(the whole place is a trainwreck of incompetence and corruption and the IT side is no exception)
22:35
<@TheWatcher>
(...)
22:36
<@TheWatcher>
http://serverfault.com/questions/293217/our-security-auditor-is-an-idiot-how-do- i-give-him-the-information-he-wants
22:36
<@TheWatcher>
That's the one McM was referring to, I believe.
22:37
<&McMartin>
That looks right.
22:39
<&McMartin>
Yeah, my grep keeps faiilng because I forget to force grep to treat my logs as text (???)
22:39
<&McMartin>
After awhile it just says "binary file #code.log matches"
22:50
<@TheWatcher>
grep's really picky about multibyte characters, so
22:51
<&McMartin>
So it would seem
22:52
<&ToxicFrog>
'grep -a' will treat everything as text
22:52
<&McMartin>
Yep
22:53
<&McMartin>
That is in fact the exact option I have to use on #code if I don't want incomplete results
23:23 Kindamoody is now known as Kindamoody[zZz]
--- Log closed Wed Apr 13 00:00:11 2016
code logs -> 2016 -> Tue, 12 Apr 2016< code.20160411.log - code.20160413.log >

[ Latest log file ]