| --- Log opened Mon Dec 31 00:00:59 2007 |
| 00:29 | | You're now known as TheWatcher[T-2] |
| 00:36 | | You're now known as TheWatcher[zZzZ] |
| 01:04 | | Vornicus is now known as Darius |
| 02:07 | | Darius is now known as Vornicus |
| 02:23 | | Attilla [~Andrew@172.201.5.ns-2743] has quit [No route to host] |
| 02:33 | | Attilla [~Andrew@Nightstar-23974.ipt.aol.com] has joined #code |
| 02:34 | < Vornicus> | I need drugs. |
| 02:47 | < Vornicus> | Many drugs. |
| 02:48 | < Vornicus> | Or, really, just one, so long as it helps me concentrate and doesn't also make me psycho. |
| 02:49 | < Attilla> | Caffeine? |
| 02:49 | < Vornicus> | Either it makes me sleepy or does nothing at all. |
| 03:22 | | * Reiver ponders Vorn. |
| 03:22 | < Reiver> | How long ago did you last see a specialist? |
| 03:22 | < Reiver> | There's more out there than methamphetamines, these days. Hell, there's a lot out there that aren't even amphetamine-analogues at all, which may help matters in your case. |
| 04:43 | | Reiver is now known as ReivOut |
| 05:44 | <@McM[SanDiego]> | Ginseng tea. |
| 05:44 | <@McM[SanDiego]> | Which actually doesn't help me, but then, caffeine works for me. |
| 05:45 | <@McM[SanDiego]> | Well. Theophylline. |
| 08:46 | | Vornicus [~vorn@ServicesOp.Nightstar.Net] has quit [Ping Timeout] |
| 09:57 | | You're now known as TheWatcher |
| 10:14 | | * McM[SanDiego] reverts the Hell out of his working copy of UQM. |
| 10:15 | | * AnnoDomini raises a couple of eyebrows. |
| 10:19 | <@McM[SanDiego]> | I'm trying to do some fairly major refactoring and am basically only succeeding in horribly breaking things, due to unsafe casts everywhere. |
| 10:26 | <@McM[SanDiego]> | Basically, I'm trying to do refactorings that assume consistency that isn't there. |
| 10:26 | <@McM[SanDiego]> | So I need to make them be consistent first. |
| 10:26 | <@McM[SanDiego]> | And when I tried to do that, I hit the same problem again. |
| 10:27 | <@McM[SanDiego]> | So now the question is how many levels deep this goes. |
| 10:28 | <@McM[SanDiego]> | And that is not a question I wish to face at the moment. Thus, teh sl33pz0r. |
| 13:42 | | Vornotron [~vorn@Admin.Nightstar.Net] has joined #code |
| 13:43 | < Vornotron> | Quite a few years ago. |
| 13:44 | < Vornotron> | Which was also the last time I had medical coverage |
| 13:48 | | AnnoDomini [AnnoDomini@Nightstar-28897.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl] has quit [Ping Timeout] |
| 13:53 | | AnnoDomini [AnnoDomini@Nightstar-29604.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl] has joined #Code |
| 13:53 | | mode/#code [+o AnnoDomini] by ChanServ |
| 14:05 | | Vornotron is now known as Vornicus |
| 14:06 | | Vornicus is now known as NSGuest-4019 |
| 14:06 | | NSGuest-4019 is now known as Vornicus |
| 15:07 | | Xiphias [Ameroth@Nightstar-25243.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #code |
| 16:00 | | Attilla [~Andrew@Nightstar-23974.ipt.aol.com] has quit [Ping Timeout] |
| 16:33 | | Xiphias [Ameroth@Nightstar-25243.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has quit [Quit: I was never gone] |
| 17:10 | | You're now known as TheWatcher[afk] |
| 17:58 | | Attilla [~Andrew@Nightstar-23974.ipt.aol.com] has joined #code |
| 18:32 | | You're now known as TheWatcher |
| 20:32 | | mode/#code [+oooooo Attilla C_tiger MyCatVerbs ReivOut Serah Vornicus] by AnnoDomini |
| 21:00 | <@C_tiger> | Wooot *powahs!* |
| 21:17 | | Vornicus [~vorn@ServicesOp.Nightstar.Net] has quit [Ping Timeout] |
| 21:45 | | Vornucopia [~vorn@Admin.Nightstar.Net] has joined #code |
| 21:46 | | Vornucopia is now known as Vornicus |
| 21:59 | | Vornicus [~vorn@ServicesOp.Nightstar.Net] has quit [Ping Timeout] |
| 22:01 | | Vornotron [~vorn@Admin.Nightstar.Net] has joined #code |
| 22:06 | <@AnnoDomini> | http://www-g.eng.cam.ac.uk/mmg/teaching/linearcircuits/mosfet.html <- Can anyone perchance identify whether the schematic truly is an n-channel enhancement MOSFET? Particularly the "n-channel enhancement" part. I have another schematic which is virtually the same (the substrate isn't doped) which is called a p-channel enhancement. |
| 22:08 | <@AnnoDomini> | Okay, I've arrived at the conclusion that they're both definitely enhancement. But how to tell what type of channel are they? |
| 22:09 | | * AnnoDomini thinks on. Yes, that's the same bloody schematic and one source calls it n-channel and the other calls it p-channel. |
| 22:17 | | * AnnoDomini has found another source which calls it n-channel. |
| 22:19 | <@AnnoDomini> | Okay. Third source for n-channel. Seems like I'll be correcting a wikipedia entry. |
| 22:20 | <@EvilDarkLord> | Did they cite their sources? |
| 22:20 | <@EvilDarkLord> | (On wikipedia, that is.) |
| 22:22 | <@AnnoDomini> | No, this is the Polish wikipedia. Rampant [citation needed] markers are absent. |
| 22:44 | | Chalcedon [~Chalcedon@203.211.126.ns-3357] has joined #code |
| 22:44 | | mode/#code [+o Chalcedon] by ChanServ |
| 22:44 | | Forj [~Forj@203.211.126.ns-3357] has joined #code |
| 22:44 | | mode/#code [+o Forj] by ChanServ |
| --- Log closed Tue Jan 01 00:00:06 2008 |