| --- Log opened Mon Jun 21 00:00:00 2021 |
| 02:06 | | Vornicus [Vorn@ServerAdministrator.Nightstar.Net] has quit [Connection closed] |
| 02:33 | <&ToxicFrog> | [R]: volatile pointer initialized with constant memory address can be used for this, yeah. |
| 03:17 | <&McMartin> | Yeah, I'm treating "initialized with an integer as the memory address" as the cheaty indirection |
| 03:18 | <&McMartin> | Compare POKE, which is a direct absolute-store command with no circumlocution |
| 03:23 | | Omega [Alek@Nightstar-06ca3p.il.comcast.net] has joined #code |
| 03:23 | | Alek [Alek@Nightstar-06ca3p.il.comcast.net] has quit [NickServ (RECOVER command used by Omega)] |
| 03:23 | | Omega is now known as Alek |
| 03:40 | | Degi [Degi@Nightstar-4koi9v.pool.telefonica.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 121 seconds] |
| 03:47 | | Degi [Degi@Nightstar-eu2nl0.pool.telefonica.de] has joined #code |
| 05:02 | | Kindamoody[zZz] is now known as Kindamoody|afk |
| 06:06 | | gnolam [lenin@Nightstar-j9ajs0.priv.bahnhof.se] has joined #code |
| 06:06 | | mode/#code [+o gnolam] by ChanServ |
| 06:26 | | Vorntastic [uid293981@Nightstar-h2b233.irccloud.com] has joined #code |
| 06:26 | | mode/#code [+qo Vorntastic Vorntastic] by ChanServ |
| 11:10 | | JustBob [justbob@Nightstar.Customer.Dissatisfaction.Administrator] has quit [Connection closed] |
| 11:10 | | JustBob [justbob@ServerAdministrator.Nightstar.Net] has joined #code |
| 11:10 | | mode/#code [+o JustBob] by ChanServ |
| 11:35 | | abudhabi_ [abudhabi@Nightstar-g6rnns.adsl.tpnet.pl] has joined #code |
| 11:38 | | abudhabi [abudhabi@Nightstar-dcq1u3.adsl.tpnet.pl] has quit [Ping timeout: 121 seconds] |
| 15:00 | | Vornicus [Vorn@ServerAdministrator.Nightstar.Net] has joined #code |
| 15:00 | | mode/#code [+qo Vornicus Vornicus] by ChanServ |
| 17:05 | | Vorntastic [uid293981@Nightstar-h2b233.irccloud.com] has quit [[NS] Quit: Connection closed for inactivity] |
| 17:47 | <@sshine> | why is there a difference between 'for e in "foo\nbar"; do echo "got: $e"; done' and 'for e in $(echo -e "foo\nbar"); do echo "got: $e"; done' |
| 17:48 | <@sshine> | both cases span two lines, but in the former I only get one 'got: ', and in the latter I get two. |
| 17:48 | <&[R]> | Because $() splits on IFS |
| 17:48 | <&[R]> | This is one of the reasons I switch to xs for shell scripting |
| 17:49 | <&[R]> | Also in the first one, you never -e the \n |
| 17:49 | <&[R]> | $ for e in "$(echo -e "foo\nbar")"; do echo "got: $e"; done |
| 17:49 | <&[R]> | got: foo |
| 17:49 | <&[R]> | bar |
| 17:51 | <&[R]> | https://termbin.com/0m49 <-- further examples (and I had the root shell open already) |
| 17:59 | <&[R]> | sshine: does that explain it for you? |
| 18:00 | <&[R]> | ($IFS is Input Field Separator) |
| 18:02 | <@sshine> | [R], ehm, almost... thanks for giving better examples. I understand that $(echo -e "foo\nbar") is two things and that "$(echo -e "foo\nbar")" is one thing, and that IFS is the special variable that determines when to split something into many things when there aren't quotes that explicitly turns them into one thing. |
| 18:04 | <&[R]> | Also your first bit of code didn't span two lines, it spanned one |
| 18:04 | <&[R]> | What questions did you still have? |
| 18:05 | <@sshine> | [R], no, I think I'm good.. just needed to parrot it back. :-D |
| 18:05 | <&[R]> | Fair enough, glad to hel |
| 18:05 | <&[R]> | help* |
| 18:08 | | Emmy [Emmy@Nightstar-l49opt.fixed.kpn.net] has joined #code |
| 18:28 | <@sshine> | I'm in charge of building the new CI/CD pipeline at work. |
| 18:29 | <@sshine> | right now we're copying the old pipeline's design: we create a pull request that merges something onto a branch called 'release/production', and that triggers some deploy commands. |
| 18:30 | <@sshine> | what sucks about this is that the HEAD of 'release/production' is always ahead of at least the merge commit, at best, and at worst, people merge over trash that just accumulates and diverges from the main branch. |
| 18:31 | <@sshine> | I've looked at ArgoCD for moving some of the deployment responsibility out of GitHub Actions, but it doesn't really change the part of the legacy design with the dedicated 'release/production' branch. |
| 18:32 | <@sshine> | the other teams at work use git tags, and manually trigger a deployment of a particular tag. we don't want to copy the manual part, and I don't know if it's possible to do a pull request that contains a tag that then gets committed to the main branch? |
| 18:33 | <@sshine> | right, PRs don't contain tags. |
| 18:33 | <@sshine> | what's an easy way to signify that something is to be released without specifying this using the merge destination? |
| 22:59 | | Kindamoody|afk is now known as Kindamoody |
| 23:46 | | Vornicus [Vorn@ServerAdministrator.Nightstar.Net] has quit [Connection closed] |
| 23:47 | | Kindamoody is now known as Kindamoody[zZz] |
| 23:56 | | Emmy [Emmy@Nightstar-l49opt.fixed.kpn.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 121 seconds] |
| --- Log closed Tue Jun 22 00:00:02 2021 |