code logs -> 2008 -> Sat, 05 Jan 2008< code.20080104.log - code.20080106.log >
--- Log opened Sat Jan 05 00:00:31 2008
00:04 Chalcy [~Chalcedon@Nightstar-2443.ue.woosh.co.nz] has joined #code
00:04 mode/#code [+o Chalcy] by ChanServ
00:05 Chalcedon [~Chalcedon@Nightstar-2443.ue.woosh.co.nz] has quit [Ping Timeout]
00:07 Syloq [Syloq@NetAdmin.Nightstar.Net] has joined #code
00:08 Syloq is now known as Syloqs-AFH
01:01 MyCatVerbs [~mycatverb@Nightstar-13709.lurkingfox.co.uk] has joined #code
02:34 gnolam [lenin@Nightstar-10613.8.5.253.static.se.wasadata.net] has quit [Quit: Z?]
03:09 Attilla [~Andrew@Nightstar-24762.ipt.aol.com] has quit [Connection reset by peer]
04:09 Syloqs-AFH [Syloq@NetAdmin.Nightstar.Net] has quit [Quit: ]
04:45 Syloq [Syloq@NetAdmin.Nightstar.Net] has joined #code
04:46 Syloq is now known as Syloqs-AFH
07:17 Vornicus is now known as Vornicus-Latens
09:04 You're now known as TheWatcher
09:43 Chalcy [~Chalcedon@Nightstar-2443.ue.woosh.co.nz] has quit [Quit: Gone]
10:15 Attilla [~Andrew@Nightstar-24762.ipt.aol.com] has joined #code
10:47 AnnoDomini [AnnoDomini@Nightstar-28889.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl] has quit [Ping Timeout]
10:54 AnnoDomini [AnnoDomini@Nightstar-29524.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl] has joined #Code
10:54 mode/#code [+o AnnoDomini] by ChanServ
11:49 Vornicus-Latens [~vorn@ServicesOp.Nightstar.Net] has quit [Ping Timeout]
12:35 gnolam [lenin@Nightstar-10613.8.5.253.static.se.wasadata.net] has joined #Code
12:35 mode/#code [+o gnolam] by ChanServ
15:28 gnolam [lenin@Nightstar-10613.8.5.253.static.se.wasadata.net] has quit [Quit: ]
15:45 gnolam [lenin@Nightstar-10613.8.5.253.static.se.wasadata.net] has joined #Code
15:45 mode/#code [+o gnolam] by ChanServ
17:05 You're now known as TheWatcher[afk]
18:16 Vornucopia [~vorn@Admin.Nightstar.Net] has joined #code
18:20 You're now known as TheWatcher
18:26 Vornucopia is now known as Vornicus
18:37 Xiphias [Ameroth@82.68.15.ns-4527] has joined #code
18:56 Xiphias [Ameroth@82.68.15.ns-4527] has quit [Quit: I was never gone]
19:32
<@AnnoDomini>
Could anyone enlighten me what "algebraic product" and "algebraic sum" would mean in context of handling fuzzy logic?
19:33
< Vornicus>
fuzzy logic is the one where you have truth values from 0 to 1?
19:33
<@AnnoDomini>
Yes.
19:34
<@AnnoDomini>
My task here is to get the same thing as with MIN(A,B), where A and B are fuzzy values, with the use of these "algebraic operators".
19:34
<@AnnoDomini>
I'm doing this in SciLab, BTW.
19:37
< Vornicus>
a*b, and a + b - a*b
19:37
<@AnnoDomini>
Hm. I'll try that.
19:39
<@AnnoDomini>
It doesn't seem to give me the same stuff.
19:39
< Vornicus>
Give me some example results of algebraic product and sum
19:42
<@AnnoDomini>
http://i15.tinypic.com/6u5j9yd.png <- This is what I should be getting.
19:43
<@AnnoDomini>
http://i8.tinypic.com/8eqfqec.png <- What I'm getting with your suggestions.
19:43
< Vornicus>
No, see
19:44
< Vornicus>
the algebraic operators are going to be your building blocks.
19:48
<@AnnoDomini>
Ah.
19:48 * AnnoDomini tries to figure it out.
19:51
< Vornicus>
I think anyway
19:53 * AnnoDomini wonders why Firefox handles image viewing so suckily compared to Opera.
19:54
< Vornicus>
Your text or notes should describe the fuzzy algebraic operators, if it expects you to use them.
19:55
<@AnnoDomini>
They are, sort of, but so far I've been unable to make sense of the explanation.
19:56
< Vornicus>
Then place the explanation here, and we shall puzzle it out together.
19:57
<@AnnoDomini>
You can read Polish?
19:57
<@AnnoDomini>
Hm. Well, I can make a printscreen of the expressions, anyway.
19:57
< Vornicus>
Sadly no.
19:58
< Vornicus>
my grandfather can, but something tells me this would be beyond him.
19:58
<@AnnoDomini>
http://i19.tinypic.com/8e0dsgp.png
19:59
< Vornicus>
Okay. the algebraic operators are, in fact, exactly what I described.
20:00
<@AnnoDomini>
So this would mean that I'm supposed to get different things. :/
20:00
< Vornicus>
Yeah
20:00
< Vornicus>
well, uh
20:00
< Vornicus>
the thing is, you're supposed to construct the min and max things, /from/ the algebraic ones.
20:02
<@AnnoDomini>
Mhm. Oh, well. I don't think I'll encounter this sort of detail on the exam.
20:41 Vornicus [~vorn@ServicesOp.Nightstar.Net] has quit [Ping Timeout]
20:44
<@TheWatcher>
hmm
20:44
<@TheWatcher>
c++ peoples, a style query/
20:46
<@TheWatcher>
Assume that a class has a constructor that does some initialisation, but neither it or any of the functions dynamically allocation any memory. The destructor has, therefore, nothing to do - do you think it is worth putting in an empty destructor with a '// Do nothing' comment in it, or just leave it out entirely?
20:49
<@TheWatcher>
I'm vaguely leaning towards the latter for completeness and readability, but... *shrug*
20:50
<@TheWatcher>
Ugh, I mean, the former - including an empty destructor (yay for my brain not working today)
20:50
<@AnnoDomini>
That'd be my thought, too. With an explanation why you're putting it there.
20:51
<@AnnoDomini>
At least whoever will be maintaining your code won't wonder why the hell you've done something like this.
20:51
<@TheWatcher>
mmhmm
20:57 Attilla [~Andrew@Nightstar-24762.ipt.aol.com] has quit [Ping Timeout]
20:57 Attilla [~Andrew@Nightstar-24762.ipt.aol.com] has joined #code
20:58 Vornotron [~vorn@Admin.Nightstar.Net] has joined #code
20:58 Vornotron is now known as Vornicus
21:15 Chalcedon [~Chalcedon@203.211.126.ns-3357] has joined #code
21:15 mode/#code [+o Chalcedon] by ChanServ
21:28
<@Kazriko>
"Most developers who work with MSSCCI eventually turn to recreational pharmaceuticals in a futile effort to cope."
21:28
<@Kazriko>
hehe.
21:29
<@AnnoDomini>
!google MSSCCI
21:29
<+DiceBot>
[AnnoDomini] http://www.google.pl/search?q=MSSCCI
21:30
<@Kazriko>
http://www.ericsink.com/scm/scm_ide_integration.html
22:00 Vornicus is now known as Finerty
23:01 Attilla [~Andrew@Nightstar-24762.ipt.aol.com] has quit [Connection reset by peer]
23:02 Attilla [~Andrew@Nightstar-24762.ipt.aol.com] has joined #code
23:08 Attilla [~Andrew@Nightstar-24762.ipt.aol.com] has quit [Ping Timeout]
23:11 Attilla [~Andrew@Nightstar-24762.ipt.aol.com] has joined #code
23:39
<@AnnoDomini>
Hm.
23:40
<@AnnoDomini>
I have broken SciLab.
23:40
<@AnnoDomini>
It seems that input values may not be 0. :P
23:42
< Finerty>
uh
23:42
< Finerty>
huh.
23:43
<@AnnoDomini>
I had to use Task Manager to shut it down, too, as it failed to parse anything after that script went haywire.
23:53
<@AnnoDomini>
Ah, I see. There seems to be a problem with the final value... it should be 1 for one term, and it's showing up as 0 across the board.
23:59 You're now known as TheWatcher[T-2]
--- Log closed Sun Jan 06 00:00:38 2008
code logs -> 2008 -> Sat, 05 Jan 2008< code.20080104.log - code.20080106.log >